In a controversial move, the Department of Justice is seeking to dismantle a leading American tech company, Apple Corp, known for its iconic iPhone and MacBook products. Critics argue that labeling Apple as a monopoly is unfounded, given the abundance of alternative smartphone manufacturers and operating systems available, such as Android.
I serve as a prime illustration of this argument. Presently, I am crafting this piece on a MacBook Pro—an apparatus I deeply cherish and have no intention of relinquishing for a PC.
Simultaneously, my smartphone of choice is a Google Pixel 8, a preference I’ve upheld since the introduction of the Google Nexus 5 back in 2015. The functionality and allure of this device rival that of an iPhone, and its affordability—nearly half or a third of the cost of an Apple phone—makes it an appealing alternative.
Furthermore, my Google phone seamlessly syncs with my MacBook, emphasizing the existence of a robust market outside of Apple’s sphere of influence. With ample competition between Apple and Android devices, the notion of an Apple monopoly appears unfounded.
The synergy between Apple’s software and hardware design, which contributes to the seamless user experience, does not signify monopolistic behavior. In contrast, the exorbitant pricing of Apple products underscores the presence of competitive forces in the market.
If we seek monopolistic entities, we need not look further than the United States government and its detrimental impact on society. It is not Apple that requires dissolution, but rather the government’s overbearing influence.
In alignment with Rand Paul’s sentiments, today’s DOJ actions against Apple stem from the company’s refusal to compromise its principles—not from any monopolistic tendencies within the App Store.
Louis KC, purportedly a satirical account, opines: “The government suing Apple for a ‘monopoly’ is the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen in antitrust matters.
Typically, a company drives competitors out of business by slashing prices or acquiring them outright, thus becoming the sole provider in the market. But Apple? They innovated and crafted their own lineup of products tailored to their ecosystem. So, we’re suing them for excelling at what they do? Yep, that’s the gist.
I’m no Apple investor, and I’m not an expert, but I do know a thing or two about the game Monopoly… and this ain’t it.”
CNBC reports:
The lawsuit claims Apple’s anti-competitive practices extend beyond the iPhone and Apple Watch businesses, citing Apple’s advertising, browser, FaceTime and news offerings.
“Each step in Apple’s course of conduct built and reinforced the moat around its smartphone monopoly,” according to the suit, filed by the DOJ and 16 attorneys general in New Jersey federal court.